Rev Esp Endocrinol Pediatr

 View / Download PDF
Rev Esp Endocrinol Pediatr 2019;10 Suppl(1):10-13 | Doi. 10.3266/RevEspEndocrinolPediatr.pre2019.Apr.520
Diagnosis and Research in Children with Proportionate Short Stature: Where are we?

Sent for review: 15 Apr. 2019 | Accepted: 15 Apr. 2019  | Published: 20 May. 2019
Martin O. Savage
Endocrinology Centre. William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London. Londres (United Kingdom)
Correspondence:Martin O. Savage, Endocrinology Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Londres, United Kingdom
Figure 1a - The continuum model of GH-IFGF-1 axis defects (1/3)
Figure 1b - The continuum model of GH-IFGF-1 axis defects (2/3)
Figure 1c - The continuum model of GH-IFGF-1 axis defects (3/3)

Introduction

Proportionate short stature constitutes the largest group of patients referred for investigation and consideration of therapy to a paediatric endocrinology unit. Short stature has multi-factorial origins, ranging from development defects to environmental, genetic and endocrine causes. In fact, non-endocrine growth disorders should be excluded in any investigational protocol before endocrine causes can be assessed in detail. A reversal of this order of events will lead to non-endocrine aetiologies being missed, resulting in inappropriate management. Of primary importance in the diagnosis of proportionate short stature cases, are the skills of the clinician in history taking and detailed and observant physical examination. The development of biochemical, genetic and radiological investigations have tended to side-line clinical skills, whereas a careful history and examination can orientate the clinician towards the correct diagnosis in the majority of cases. During the out-patient consultation, it is more important to look carefully at the patient than to concentrate on data emerging on the computer screen.

The continuum model of growth hormone (GH)-IGF-1 axis defects1 will be taken as the basis for this plenary presentation. Two major aetiological groups can now be defined as causative influences in growth disorders. These are defects in the GH-IGF-1 axis1 and primary growth plate abnormalities2. Considerable progress has been made recently in the understanding of growth plate physiology and pathophysiology, however these advances will not be discussed, as they fall outside the title of the lecture. In contrast, biochemical, radiological and genetic advances will be described. Both the topics of investigation and therapy will be addressed separately, but in a logical order, following the continuum model (Figure 1) from severe to mild GH deficiency, then moving through the topic of idiopathic short stature (ISS) into disorders of GH action, known as GH resistance (GHR) defects, which will be considered from the mild forms through to the severe examples of GHR phenotypes. Finally, a conclusion will attempt to address the question in the lecture title, ie ‘where are we?’

Diagnostic progress

The most severe cases of GH deficiency may present in infancy, when the GH deficiency is often associated with additional anterior pituitary defects, notably of TSH, ACTH and gonadotrophins. Such patients require biochemical determination of baseline hormone concentrations. Provocative tests of GH secretion are contraindicated because of the risk of severe hypoglycaemia and GH secretory status can be indirectly assessed by measurement of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations. Of primary importance is the performance of a pituitary MRI scan, which may show the characteristic features of hypopituitarism, namely ectopic posterior pituitary gland, thin or invisible pituitary stalk and anterior pituitary hypoplasia3. Alternatively, the MRI may identify a development lesion such as septo-optic dysplasia, a classical organic cause of infantile hypopituitarism. Genetic studies with Sanger sequencing of genes involved in pituitary development such as POU1F1 (POU Class 1 Homeobox 1) and PROP1 (PROP paired-like homeobox) should also be considered.

As the order, described above, of GH-IGF-1 defects in the continuum model progresses, the entity known as idiopathic short stature (ISS) should be considered. It is important to appreciate that ISS is not a clearly defined entity, but constitutes a description of heterogeneous causes of apparent abnormal growth. The most common causes of ISS are normal variants of growth, namely constitutional delay of growth and puberty and particularly genetic short stature, which is, in itself, hugely heterogeneous. The GH-IGF-1 axis is essentially normal in ISS.

As GH sensitivity decreases along the ‘X’ axis of the continuum model, disorders of GH action, known collectively as GH resistance or primary IGF-1 deficiency, need to be considered. Classical GH resistance (GHR), first described in 1966 by Laron et al.4, was initially considered to embrace all GHR states. However, we now know that this is not the case as mild GHR phenotypes have increasingly been described during the past ten years. Recent reviews have discussed such cases5.6, notably including the new PAPPA2 mutations, reported by Jesus Argente from Madrid and collaborators in 20167. The possibility of heterozygous mutations, notably of STAT5b and IGFALS genes also causing a proportional short stature phenotype has been reported8. Clinical assessment and biochemical characterisation are also very important aspects of the investigation of GHR defects. In a selected cohort of 102 cases of GHR in whom DNA was sent for genetic analysis, a positive diagnosis was achieved by a combination of Sanger and whole exome sequencing in fifty, ie 49%6,9. Notably a positive genetic diagnosis was predicted most strongly by two factors, the severity of the short stature and the presence of parental consanguinity6.

Advances in therapy

Growth-promoting treatment in proportionate short stature consists, by definition, of replacement therapy with hGH or rhIGF-1. The skill and judgement about when and how to prescribe such therapy are key components of optimal clinical management. Treatment of GH deficiency requires replacement with ‘physiological’ doses of hGH (18-25 μg/kg/day). The more severe the GH deficiency, the more responsive the patient is to hGH replacement, ie the smaller the dose that is needed to be effective. Varying responses to GH have demonstrated that hGH therapy should be individualised.  Children with milder GH deficiency require higher doses (25-35 μg/kg/day). These ‘replacement’ doses contrast with the higher ‘pharmacological’ doses required in non-GH deficiency disorders, such as Turner syndrome and short stature following birth size small for gestational age. In ISS, short children with normal GH secretion who have short healthy parents have poor responses to even pharmacologic doses of hGH.

RhIGF-1 is licensed by EMA since 2007 to treat short children with GHR defined as height <-3 SDS, low IGF-1 (<2.5th centile) and normal GH secretion. This replacement therapy is effective in doses of 80-120 μg/kg/twice daily. Its long-term efficacy is well documented in classical GHR patients10, but much less well documented in milder cases6. There is evidence that addition of a GnRH analogue can give extra height benefit during puberty10.

Where are we? What we know and what we do not know

We know that clinical skills are beneficial to early diagnosis and that GH deficiency is best diagnosed from a combination of auxological, biochemical and radiological data. We know that genetic discoveries explain new physiological mechanisms11 and that GHR covers a range of short stature phenotypes from extreme to mild growth delay. We know that hGH dosage should be individualised, poor responses historically are common and adherence to hGH is said to be poor. We know that long-acting preparations are likely to be licensed within the next 3-5 years.

On the other hand, we do not know how much genetic research and analyses contribute to patient management. Neither do we know the relative contributions of growth plate pathology compared to GH-IGF-1 axis defects to proportionate short stature as it is currently referred for investigation. We do not know the best way of detecting and effectively managing poor adherence to hGH. Long-acting hGH is coming, but we do not know if there is interest in developing long-acting rhIGF-1.

Conclusions

The field of short stature continues to develop both diagnostically and therapeutically. Basic research is almost entirely molecular- or gene-based, with new regulatory mechanisms of linear growth being discovered on a regular basis. The field of GH therapy is active with the imminent arrival of long-acting hGH. Considerable challenges remain, with many growth disorders still untreatable and many patients experiencing the stigmata and disadvantages of subnormal height both in childhood and as adults.

References
  1. Savage MO, Burren CP, Rosenfeld RG. The Continuum of Growth Hormone-IGF-I Axis Defects Causing Short Stature: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges. Clin Endocrinol. 2010; 72: 721-728.[Pubmed]
  2. Barron J, Savendahl L, De Luca F, Dauber A, Phillip M, Wit JM, Nilsson O. Short and tall stature: a new paradigm emerges. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.165.
  3. Pampanini V, Pedicelli S, Gubinelli J, Scirè G, Cappa M, Boscherini B, Cianfarani S. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging as First-Line Investigation for Growth Hormone Deficiency Diagnosis in Early Childhood. Horm Res Paediatr 2015; 84: 323-330.[Pubmed]
  4. Laron Z, Pertzelan A, Mannheimer S Genetic pituitary dwarfism with high serum concentation of growth hormone--a new inborn error of metabolism? Isr J Med Sci. 1966; 2: 152-155.
  5. Vairamani K, Merjaneh L, Casano-Sancho P, Sanli ME, David A, Metherell LA, Savage MO, Sanchez del Pozo J, Backeljauw PF, Rosenfeld RG, Aisenberg J, Dauber A, Hwa V. Dominant Negative GH Receptor Mutations Expands the Spectrum of GHI and IGF-1 Deficiency.  J Endocr Soc 2017; 1: 345-358.[Pubmed]
  6. Storr HL, Chatterjee S, Foley C, Metherell LA, Backeljauw PF, Rosenfeld RG, Dauber A, Savage MO, Hwa V. Non-classical Growth Hormone Insensitivity (GHI): Characterization of Mild Abnormalities of GH Action. Endocr Rev 2019; 40: 476-505.[Pubmed]
  7. Dauber A, Muñoz-Calvo MT, Barrios V, Domené HM, Kloverpris S, Serra-Juhé C, Desikan V, Pozo J, Muzumdar R, Martos-Moreno GÁ, Hawkins F, Jasper HG, Conover CA, Frystyk J, Yakar S, Hwa V, Chowen JA, Oxvig C, Rosenfeld RG, Pérez-Jurado LA, Argente J. Mutations in pregnancy-associated plasma protein A2 cause short stature due to low IGF-I availability. EMBO Mol Med. 2016; 8:363-374.
  8. Scalco RCHwa VDomené HMJasper HGBelgorosky AMarino RPereira AMTonelli CAWit JMRosenfeld RGJorge AA. STAT5B mutations in heterozygous state have negative impact on height: another clue in human stature heritability. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015; 173: 291-296.
  9. Shapiro L, Chatterjee S, Ramadan D, Savage MO, Metherell LA, Storr HL. Whole exome Sequencing gives Additional Benefits Compared to Candidate Gene Sequencing in the Molecular Diagnosis of Children with Growth Hormone or IGF-1 Insensitivity. European Journal of Endocrinology 2017; 177: 485-501.[Pubmed]
  10. Backeljauw PF, Kuntze J, Frane J, Calikoglu AS, Chernausek SD. Adult and near-adult height in patients with severe insulin-like growth factor-I deficiency after long-term therapy with recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013; 80: 47-56.[Pubmed]
  11. Argente J, Chowen JA, Pérez-Jurado LA, Frystyk J, Oxvig C. One level up: abnormal proteolytic regulation of IGF activity plays a role in human pathophysiology. EMBO Mol Med. 2017; 9:1338-1345.[Pubmed]


Comments
Name*: Surname*:
E-mail*:
Hospital*:
Address:
C.P.: Country:
Comments*:
(450 Words)
Security code*:
* Required Fields
Send
Send Send Send
Send